![]() They can work on your computer at the same time and to check the charts based on each trading system you only need to click on each platform icon on your computer taskbar.Īlso, some traders have more than one monitor. It is a pain to switch between the different templates or profiles on the same platform any time you want to check the charts based on one of the trading systems. But you can simply install and run multiple instances of MetaTrader on your computer and have only one of the systems and its related template and profile on each. For example, you follow more than one trading system and you have a different template for each. This will ofcourse potentially create conflicts with the app internal files if it opens for example an internal sqlite file, so you must really know what you are doing or don't care if something breaks.Sometimes you need to run multiple instances of MetaTrader platform on your computer at the same time. If the app does not self check for clones, you will have a new window. In Windows 8 and newer, you hold the Shift key and click the programs' icon/button on taskbar. also check out SoftXSpand really awesome, allows u to run multiple instances of windows as independent users Solution 5 ![]() I dont see why windows doesn't implement running games multi times in splits/snaps as a feature anyway! its clearly because people wouldn't buy as many PC's. go here for detailed instructions - īut yeah that's for half-life but get Process Explorer and im sure you'll be able to find which handle/process you need to close in order to get the programs u want running multi times. To do this, you need 'Process Explorer' - a program that allows you to do what is known as 'Close Handle' on the '\BaseNamedObjects\ValveHalfLifeLauncherMutex' sub-process or something. Here is an image of me running half-life 1 4x in 4 windows all connected to the same LAN server, the only problem is the controllers not being independently linked to each window. You can run application on different users accounts and instance checking will not work anymore. Bypassing that could lead to data corruption or simply failing to run. ![]() In 32-bit Windows, with protected memory, process-specific address spaces, and the end of cooperative multitasking, the HINSTANCEs no longer carried the same meaning.Ī small number of apps do this simply for "usability", but for many others, there may be a good reason to enforce singletons. In those days, that was probably the most common way for the program to know if a copy was already running. It would also be passed the HINSTANCE of a currently running process using the same executable (if any). In 16-bit Windows, when a program started, the OS passed it a unique handle called an HINSTANCE. If it fails because another instance already holds the resource, then it might try to signal the original instance so that it can respond. If the app succeeds, then it holds that resource as long as it runs. Many of the methods involve trying to get some machine-wide (or, at least, user-wide) resource (e.g., a named synchronization object, a file with a well-known name and location, or a registry value). There is no generic way because different applications use different methods. ![]() You may try to set hook (see samples SetWindowsHookEx, CallNextHookEx, etc) to hook those specific API function calls from that application and replace requested data in response with yours to fool the application. Many applications check the global list of processes (with EnumProcesses, OpenProcess, GetModuleBaseName, and similar functions) or list of windows (with EnumWindows, EnumChildWindows).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |